: Pics of the mg6 diesel


dmc123
20-12-2011, 15:35
http://www.aronline.co.uk/blogs/2011/12/19/news-mg6-diesel-given-a-royal-unveiling/


enjoy shame it was a t**t like prince andrew that got to see it before us!!

Chrisund123
20-12-2011, 19:58
What utterly crap pictures :lol:

Just teasing! lol. Very interested though.

forehead
21-12-2011, 06:27
Read the comments underneath.

"prince was shown the diesel engine MG posted the pics on Facebook then realised they'd cocked up and had to remove them"

Classic :)

Welcome back BL all is forgiven :)

JoCoLo
23-12-2011, 07:31
I think Prince Andrew gets a hard time. At least he tries to promote British products abroad instead of running them down like many of his fellow countrymen. OK he has the odd helicopter ride but I'm certain he's made up for that 100x with sales of goods he's oiled the wheel of.

thatone1967
23-12-2011, 08:02
I think Prince Andrew gets a hard time. At least he tries to promote British products abroad instead of running them down like many of his fellow countrymen. OK he has the odd helicopter ride but I'm certain he's made up for that 100x with sales of goods he's oiled the wheel of.

I agree...

t0m4ever
23-12-2011, 08:33
I think Prince Andrew gets a hard time. At least he tries to promote British products abroad instead of running them down like many of his fellow countrymen. OK he has the odd helicopter ride but I'm certain he's made up for that 100x with sales of goods he's oiled the wheel of.

Let's not forget he also served as a Sea King co-pilot during the Falklands War, which is much more then most of us can say.

patpending
23-12-2011, 18:30
Let's not forget he also served as a Sea King co-pilot during the Falklands War, which is much more then most of us can say.

They used Sea Kings in the Falklands? Didn't know there were astronauts splashing down :lol: (though let's face it, there never was a Falklands war, it was a conflict or kerfuffle)

http://www.reemandansie.com/images/uploads/6844/379.jpg

jaffo
23-12-2011, 18:37
Let's not forget he also served as a Sea King co-pilot during the Falklands War, which is much more then most of us can say.

+1

and im sure it felt like a war to those involved,not sitting comfortably on sofa's watching from 8000 miles away.

patpending
23-12-2011, 19:28
+1

and im sure it felt like a war to those involved,not sitting comfortably on sofa's watching from 8000 miles away.To anyone who was old enough to understand at the time, of course, it never was officially a war, and to try to change that now is the worst kind of revisionism. Which is why to say "Falklands war" is formally incorrect.

jaffo
23-12-2011, 19:33
To anyone who was old enough to understand at the time, of course, it never was officially a war, and to try to change that now is the worst kind of revisionism. Which is why to say "Falklands war" is formally incorrect.

war1    [wawr] Show IPA noun, verb, warred, war·ring, adjective
noun
1.
a conflict carried on by force of arms, as between nations or between parties within a nation; warfare, as by land, sea, or air.
2.
a state or period of armed hostility or active military operations: The two nations were at war with each other.
3.
a contest carried on by force of arms, as in a series of battles or campaigns: the War of 1812.
4.
active hostility or contention; conflict; contest: a war of words.


so,hardly revisionism...just a different view held by yourself and others which is technically incorrect....just because war was never officially declared by either party,the acts that took place can be defined as'war'.

anything else is splitting hairs for the sake of it...

Steve LE
23-12-2011, 19:44
war1    [wawr] Show IPA noun, verb, warred, war·ring, adjective
noun
1.
a conflict carried on by force of arms, as between nations or between parties within a nation; warfare, as by land, sea, or air.
2.
a state or period of armed hostility or active military operations: The two nations were at war with each other.
3.
a contest carried on by force of arms, as in a series of battles or campaigns: the War of 1812.
4.
active hostility or contention; conflict; contest: a war of words.


so,hardly revisionism...just a different view held by yourself and others which is technically incorrect....just because war was never officially declared by either party,the acts that took place can be defined as'war'.

anything else is splitting hairs for the sake of it...

This is the most off topic quote I have ever seen on this forum & thats saying something.....................:indiff:

Merry Xmas :candle:

jaffo
23-12-2011, 19:52
This is the most off topic quote I have ever seen on this forum & thats saying something.....................:indiff:

Merry Xmas :candle:

it is isnt it...im quite proud of that...

and merry crimbo too.

patpending
23-12-2011, 20:03
This is the most off topic quote I have ever seen on this forum & thats saying something.....................:indiff:

Merry Xmas :candle:I am so ashamed. :lol:

Let's face it, we can't just change history to suit our own agenda. To believe we can is either innocence or ignorance. Arguing about it? well...

Didn't this start with something to do with an MG?

andycolm
23-12-2011, 20:38
Jesus Pat, that was the biggest load of ****e you have ever posted.
Left wing revisionist troll alert.

forehead
23-12-2011, 20:45
I'm sure the families of the service men who died during the 'war' considered it as such.

I always thought it was a wag the dog exercise to get the thatcher government re elected ;)

Left wing me ? Never :)

t0m4ever
23-12-2011, 22:32
They used Sea Kings in the Falklands? Didn't know there were astronauts splashing down :lol: (though let's face it, there never was a Falklands war, it was a conflict or kerfuffle)

http://www.reemandansie.com/images/uploads/6844/379.jpg

http://www.memecreator.net/futurama-fry/showimage.php/633/not-sure-if-serious-or-just-trolling.jpg

Whether it was officially a war or not should have no bearing on people's views towards the military personnel who risked their lives for the UK and the people of the Falklands.

Peterover
24-12-2011, 00:43
How on earth did a thread on the mg6 diesel end up like this.. Wow thread drift lol..

t0m4ever
24-12-2011, 08:21
True.

Back on topic, is the front of that red Magnette the same as on all MG6's? It somehow looks a little meaner and beefier in that photo to me.

simondhopkins
24-12-2011, 09:02
http://cars.uk.msn.com/news/prince-andrew-scoops-new-mg6-diesel

There is another link. I personaly think its a PSA TDCI Engine, not sure though.

Steven211
24-12-2011, 10:23
http://cars.uk.msn.com/news/prince-andrew-scoops-new-mg6-diesel

There is another link. I personaly think its a PSA TDCI Engine, not sure though.

Nope it is their own engine!

rover25/45
24-12-2011, 14:16
I'm sure the families of the service men who died during the 'war' considered it as such.

I always thought it was a wag the dog exercise to get the thatcher government re elected ;)

Left wing me ? Never :)
Quality statement as ever mate!

simondhopkins
25-12-2011, 00:21
Nope it is their own engine!

In house design or just a devlopment of the L/G series? Loved my old L series.

JoCoLo
26-12-2011, 10:44
Will be a new design. The L series lives on in India as G series.

forehead
28-12-2011, 13:58
Pity they couldnt have got a licence to use the engine over here.

I bet once the Longbridge lads had got their hands on it with the 16v head it would match or better the new 2.0 TDi VAG unit as the L series did when the old 1.9TDi unit was only making 90hp.

SteveChilds
04-01-2012, 09:41
Pity they couldnt have got a licence to use the engine over here.

I bet once the Longbridge lads had got their hands on it with the 16v head it would match or better the new 2.0 TDi VAG unit as the L series did when the old 1.9TDi unit was only making 90hp.

Definitely, although from my understanding, there were ownership issues with the G-Series, which is why they went the route of doing their own. Wonder if any of the G-Series team is with SAIC now?