Originally Posted by David Day Via Email
Please post the report about the police being involved as it will be evident that I knew of this before there was any public announcement. Then there are two other interesting reports that they may not have seen on page 22 and 23 from the first note when someone was saying nothing can be seen, these are as follows:
“The wheels of investigation and bureaucracy may turn slowly but when it is government money and someone else can be blamed for "bad behaviour", the procedure is very thorough.
Maybe there would have been an investigation anyway. You may know that the DTI did want to hush it up a short while ago.
Perhaps because the ignorance of the OITC offer by PWC and Eversheds annoyed the OITC cabinet intensely, they made noises, via a concerned person in Birmingham, to an MP who put pressure on the newly appointed DTI motoring department chief who could not escape searching questions after a local TV programme, to issue a report.
What they had all hoped would not happen is an investigation by the Serious Fraud Office and the National Audit Office. Both are now underway but to state exactly what degree is not my remit. I can say that OITC have already offered help and will continue to assist in any way possible.
What I have been doing on this forum web site is to bring to the attention of all interested persons (Creditors, ex-employees and employees, enthusiast and others) the fact that workers should NEVER have had to go through any of the catastrophe (Loss of jobs, serious damage to the Pension Funds, deceit), either in the last 5 or so years, or the last few months, and if at all possible OITC will invest enough money into the now ailing MGR so that full re-instatement of assets and production takes place. THIS TIME WITH HONEST CONTROL AND EXPERIENCED MANAGEMENT AND A PROPERLY MAPPED OUT PLAN FOR EXPANSION IN THE FUTURE. 17.41 by d.day
To those who want details of how to verify the OITC:
“Verification can only be undertaken utilising a specific protocols and procedures. This has been clearly explained in one of my previous posts. The OITC do not reveal information of a classified nature to any individual or entity. Details of how to undertake verification will be given only to specific Government Ministers, Central Bank Governors.
Now if you would like to nominate a Government Minister, such as the Minister for Trade and Industry, The Chancellor of the Exchequer, The Foreign Minister or even the Prime Minister, and request that he formally writes to the Special Emissary, he is assured of receiving all requisite details of how verification should be undertaken and the protocols / procedures to be applied.
I have to tell you, Eversheds do not have the relevant security clearance level. The same applies to persons on this board.
The Special Emissary is awaiting the formal request and has given a full undertaking that any request from a suitable Minister or Central Bank Officer will be attended to within 24 hours of receipt.
Being a continuous posters to this thread, you would have read all my previous posts, especially the one relating to verification.
Please request Mr Jack Straw to formally write to the Special Emissary requesting the specific information for verification of the OITC.
The Special Emissary has been informed and is now awaiting the formal request, upon receipt of which a response will be sent to Mr Jack Straw within 24 hours, giving all details.
Provided Mr Straw attends to this himself and in accordance with protocol, be assured he will receive the full verification of the OITC.
If he would prefer to pass this to the Governor of the Bank of England, then even better, as it is quicker, but the same rules apply to the Governor, which is full compliance with protocol.
If your side fail to comply and come back with nothing, then don’t blame us, as we know that verification will be given, has been given in the past, and continues to be given, provided protocol and procedures are fully applied.
You will of course, need the address to pass to Mr Jack Straw:
You are advised that should protocol and procedures not be applied the relevant Office at the UN will not respond. You will also need to quote your UN Clearing Number.
Parties other than specific Government Ministers, Ambassadors, or Central Bank Governors will never be entertained.
If you desire, we could allow your bank to verify some securities on Euroclear or Bloomberg screens. In which case, you should request your Senior Bank Officer to undertake the same formal request for the information to be provided, which will be provided only to your Bank Officer, under strict conditions.
Should anyone else require to write to the Special Emissary, please do so. One person in the office has been designated to handle all mail relative to MG Rover enquiries. Wherever possible, responses will be made within 48 hours depending upon amount of enquiries, which are quite substantial at the moment.
We can not be more open about that, can we. The rest now is up to your nominated person and their full compliance with the applicable protocols and procedures. We do not fear the results, as we know what they will be, having already done this several times. However, should there be a deliberate attempt to sabotage a verification process, we will know about it and will be able to give you the facts accordingly.
At least your request for such information indicates to me that you are even unsure about what you are, and have been saying. You therefore need to prove right or wrong. Please go ahead, we welcome it as we have absolutely nothing to hide. We now patiently wait.
D.A.Sale. Special Emissary,
Senior Commercial Advisor to H.E. The Chairman, The Office of International Treasury Control,
To Simon Goldberger 17.58
1. Tim Day is not the same person as David Day
2. You do (NOT) seem to understand or know of all the facts - going back 5 years and that includes deals done in Honk Kong and elsewhere
3. From response so far there are a lot of people who would welcome an offer as big, and fair and honest as that of the OITC offer.
So far, as we have uncovered, persons wishing to put the OITC offer to one side seem to be hiding another motive. This, in fact, could be construed as criminal negligence on the part of PWC.
To Passer by 18.03
Oddly enough I have had folders full of international money scams on my desk for more than 15 years. I think in your case you should just sit back and wait. Bear in mind we are talking to investigating bodies and government all the time at the moment.
Finally, as an answer to N Birse and as a general statement please add this:
Dear N. Birse, you in particular have gone way beyond the boundaries of decency and have offended myself (David Day), my family, all those connected to, or associated with the OITC, and the many decent people, some at government and United Nations level who trust and know the work of OITC and the people it has chosen to work with, to be of the highest quality, honesty and integrity.
You and some others have been guilty of serious defamation in the plural and may well have caused untold damage to the OITC, and probably seriously impeded the progression of economic development in Third World countries, as this is one main aspect and objective of theOITC. This has not gone un-noticed and you are advised to take note of this fact. Clearly you have no idea of the size, power and international legal standing of OITC, and I doubt if you will ever know, for even in a law court I know that certain classified data will not be made available to you, only to the judge This I say, with respect and without knowing what position or job you have in society, banking or government department, if you have a position at all.
Defamation, libel, slander, is a serious offence against a person or party. You are not exempt neither are Forum Boards. Exemption is within the law itself, not added to the law by, or under the free will of persons or parties whose aim it is to defame and discredit others without just cause or proof beyond reasonable doubt.
There have already been two successful cases, now case law, against those who defame and libel others on Web Forum Boards. More will, no doubt, follow.