ZT 2.5 (190 and 160 ) MPG - MG-Rover.org Forums
 
 
 
Go Back   MG-Rover.org Forums > Model Specific Forums > MG ZT / Rover 75 (Sponsored by Rimmer Bros)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 15-08-2007, 17:37   #1
zozzie_9t9
Registered User
 

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: East Yorkshire
Car: 2 x Rover 620ti, MG ZT 190+
Posts: 217
ZT 2.5 (190 and 160 ) MPG

Could people give me a good (and honest!) idea of the fuel consumption figures they get with their ZT V6's please?

One a 45 mile commute, mostly motorways, but about eight miles of B road to reach the motorway, would it be better or worse than my current 620ti?

Thanks in advnace
zozzie_9t9 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 15-08-2007, 17:48   #2
Stu C
Registered User
 

Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Telford, Shropshire
Car: MG ZT 260SE & Rover 25 iL Derv
Posts: 10,841
Blog Entries: 3
Send a message via MSN to Stu C
I give mine a good booting pretty much all the time, and some sensible driving on the motorways i usually get around 25.8mpg. When i went abroad with it last week, she got 30mpg on a steady run with 3 blokes and a boot full of luguage
Stu C is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Old 15-08-2007, 18:00   #3
chilljohn
Registered User
 

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Notts
Car: Rover 75
Posts: 2,230
as above i get a constant 25-27 mpg or on a tight arse day i can get mid 30s but thats rare (the way i drive) having gone from a ti to the 190 the ti was better on juice BUT i think that was down to the 5th gear the 190 really needs 6 gears as it doesnt have a "cruise" gear
the 190 wasnt designed to be good on fuel just ot be enjoyed

you wont look back
chilljohn is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Old 15-08-2007, 18:05   #4
NickTL
Supporter
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bristol
Car: MG6
Posts: 3,670
I get about 60 miles to 10. Its nearly 5 a gallon these days. So I guess around 28 mpg!!

Nick.
NickTL is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Old 15-08-2007, 18:06   #5
murphyzt
Registered User
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Thornton, Lancs
Car: Cadillac CTS 3.6 Executive Sports
Posts: 1,292
The 180 is slightly better for motorway use due to the gearing, sitting just under 3,000 rpm at 85mph. Average return over 6k being 28.2mpg.

I appreciate you asked about 160 and 190 but should give you a general idea.
murphyzt is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Old 15-08-2007, 20:07   #6
DAD
Registered User
 

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Leeds
Car: ZT 190 + and ZR 105 +
Posts: 922
My newish (18K) 190 is doing 29mpg.

Lots of slow driving going to work, but includes the odd hyperspace moments, so worth it I think.

Can't comment on the 160's though sorry.
DAD is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Old 16-08-2007, 09:49   #7
diyaster
Registered User
 

Join Date: Jul 2007
Car: 190
Posts: 20
2005 190 2.5 V6 does 345 miles to 65ltr tank = 25mpg, mix of town and A roads.
diyaster is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Old 16-08-2007, 13:58   #8
seo9185
Registered User
 

Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cambridge
Car: 2005 Nissan 350z GT
Posts: 8,106
Quote:
Originally Posted by diyaster View Post
2005 190 2.5 V6 does 345 miles to 65ltr tank = 25mpg, mix of town and A roads.
Mine does about the same, maybe a bit more but not much.
seo9185 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Old 16-08-2007, 15:54   #9
higgi21
Supporter
 

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bucks
Car: Rover 45
Posts: 186
Round trip to work is 130 miles of mostly m/way,20 litres of V Power will do the job,equates to ,as near as damn it 25 mpg @ between 70 and 90 mph........
higgi21 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Reply

Bookmarks

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the MG-Rover.org Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ZT-T 2.5 160 Realistic MPG ??? drewby MG ZT / Rover 75 (Sponsored by Rimmer Bros) 17 10-05-2007 08:09
ZT 160 vs ZT 190 whats the difference? TiGaZ MG/R Modification & Tuning 1 15-03-2006 01:22
zt 160 vs zt 190 ?? whats the difference? TiGaZ MG ZT / Rover 75 (Sponsored by Rimmer Bros) 4 13-03-2006 11:12
MG ZT 190+ 2004 (manual) mpg danielt MG ZT / Rover 75 (Sponsored by Rimmer Bros) 9 10-01-2006 20:14
MPG for ZT 190+ drowlands MG ZT / Rover 75 (Sponsored by Rimmer Bros) 32 18-06-2005 20:55


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:26.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ShowCase, Vendor Tools vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.