Head Gasket Failure after Land Rover Gasket Fitted? - MG-Rover.org Forums
 
 
 Sponsored Insurance Links: Car Insurance  |  Van  |  Home  |  Bike  |  Travel  |  Breakdown  |  Convicted Driver Insurance
 
Go Back   MG-Rover.org Forums > Model Specific Forums > MGF and MGTF (Sponsored by MGF Mania)

View Poll Results: After installing the upgraded LAND ROVER Head gasket have you suffered a HGF again?
NO - the car is fine until now. 248 75.38%
YES - I did suffer an HGF on my LAND ROVER gasket. 81 24.62%
Voters: 329. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 29-12-2007, 13:51   #1
PERRY-MGTF
Registered User
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Thessaloniki-Greece
Car: MG TF Anniversary Edition #869 of 1600
Posts: 6,297
Send a message via MSN to PERRY-MGTF Send a message via Skype™ to PERRY-MGTF
Head Gasket Failure after Land Rover Gasket Fitted?

It would be interesting to see how many of us that have used the upgraded Land Rover head gasket after suffering an HGF had again the same problem. Just to see whether it is really an improvement or not.

Also please state your mileage/kilometers done after the Land Rover gasket fitted.
PERRY-MGTF is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 29-12-2007, 13:58   #2
Baracus
Registered User
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bury, Manchester
Car: BMW Z4 3.0Si Sport
Posts: 3,084
Send a message via MSN to Baracus
Fitted LR Gasket myself after 3 days of ownership about 20 moths ago i reckon now. that was on 19k miles, now done 60k so that's about 40k miles on the new LR gasket with no problems at all and the head was not skimmed

all i have done since is make sure my oil is up to the right temp before i nail it but the car does get a fair amount of abuse once warmed up
Baracus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-12-2007, 14:22   #3
PERRY-MGTF
Registered User
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Thessaloniki-Greece
Car: MG TF Anniversary Edition #869 of 1600
Posts: 6,297
Send a message via MSN to PERRY-MGTF Send a message via Skype™ to PERRY-MGTF
Myself used to be sooo careful about not reving umore than 3,000 when the car was below 90 C temp and I suffred the HG. Now with the LR gasket and after 30,000 km or 20,000 miles I really care less and abuse the car more. Not because I feel safe with the LR gaket but because my extreme care before did not prevent anything....
PERRY-MGTF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-12-2007, 14:32   #4
Baracus
Registered User
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bury, Manchester
Car: BMW Z4 3.0Si Sport
Posts: 3,084
Send a message via MSN to Baracus
Quote:
Originally Posted by PERRY-MGTF View Post
Myself used to be sooo careful about not reving umore than 3,000 when the car was below 90 C temp and I suffred the HG. Now with the LR gasket and after 30,000 km or 20,000 miles I really care less and abuse the car more. Not because I feel safe with the LR gaket but because my extreme care before did not prevent anything....
yeah i'm nowhere near as careful as some people on here, I will sometimes take it to around 6k revs even when cold (sometimes i just can't help myself) but i don't go to 7.2k revs (limit) when cold. Other than that i usually take it easy until fully warmed up. taking it easy for me would be never above 4k revs and that's only because i live next to the motorway
Baracus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-12-2007, 14:38   #5
crross
Registered User
 

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Naaaarwich
Car: MGF
Posts: 221
Send a message via MSN to crross
I want to say I've not had a problem....but we all know what happens when you say something is working fine....
crross is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-12-2007, 14:42   #6
Baracus
Registered User
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bury, Manchester
Car: BMW Z4 3.0Si Sport
Posts: 3,084
Send a message via MSN to Baracus
Quote:
Originally Posted by crross View Post
I want to say I've not had a problem....but we all know what happens when you say something is working fine....
yeah there is that lol. although i did create a thread a while ago saying mine was running fine cos there where so many negative posts at the time and so far all is still running fine (touches wood *again*)
Baracus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-12-2007, 14:50   #7
empsburna
Registered User
 

Join Date: Jun 2002
Car: Other Manufacturer
Posts: 34,945
I will say that still far to early to tell
empsburna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-12-2007, 15:41   #8
D.R.
Registered User
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: N.Ireland
Car: MG
Posts: 1,028
Since July 2006, 14k miles and counting on the original oil rail, with original stretch bolts in a 1.8 Freelander (MEMS 1.9)
There are a couple of reports of failures from MG-Rover.org and Landyzone.co.uk, although its likely that the liners and head face were not checked in accordance with LR tech bulletin 0036, Ref L8935bu, Date 18.06.04
Surprisingly, there are also reports from a LR technician on Landyzone.co.uk of the new gasket removing any discrepancies in the head face.

Last edited by D.R.; 29-12-2007 at 16:39.
D.R. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-12-2007, 17:10   #9
MGFmad
Never forgotten
 
MGFmad's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Fife Scotland
Car: Astra CDX auto, Freelander TD4 & Freelander 1.8, Mini One
Posts: 8,637
Send a message via MSN to MGFmad
To early for me to report yet - replaced my HG at 98K in June 2007 with a Landrover Gasket, fitted new stretch bolts but retained the original oil rail - I suspect my original gasket failure was because of the very loose fitting plastic dowels.

I have now covered 5.5K......fingers crossed
__________________
Former LE500 owner

Last edited by MGFmad; 29-12-2007 at 17:11. Reason: typo
MGFmad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-12-2007, 11:45   #10
PERRY-MGTF
Registered User
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Thessaloniki-Greece
Car: MG TF Anniversary Edition #869 of 1600
Posts: 6,297
Send a message via MSN to PERRY-MGTF Send a message via Skype™ to PERRY-MGTF
I did not change the oil rail either.
PERRY-MGTF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-12-2007, 16:24   #11
Baracus
Registered User
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bury, Manchester
Car: BMW Z4 3.0Si Sport
Posts: 3,084
Send a message via MSN to Baracus
Quote:
Originally Posted by PERRY-MGTF View Post
I did not change the oil rail either.
Me neither, even though i bought it
Baracus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-12-2007, 16:37   #12
merryhobgoblin
Registered User
 

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Colchester essex
Car: Lotus elise SC
Posts: 122
Quote:
Originally Posted by PERRY-MGTF View Post
Myself used to be sooo careful about not reving umore than 3,000 when the car was below 90 C temp and I suffred the HG. Now with the LR gasket and after 30,000 km or 20,000 miles I really care less and abuse the car more. Not because I feel safe with the LR gaket but because my extreme care before did not prevent anything....
I must say that i have changed a fair few head gaskets and replaced them with the new MLS gaskets and have yet to have anyone come back which is quite a feat as some of my younger customers are less than subtle when it comes to there right foot screaming past the workshop minutes after picking there Rovers up and although i use the BGA version of the gasket made by LR i don't think that would make to much difference
merryhobgoblin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-12-2007, 17:04   #13
Dr Dave
Administrator
 
Dr Dave's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2001
Car: 2006 330d M Sport
Posts: 78,881
Blog Entries: 5
Garages
Good to hear these reports....

I remember when I found the LR gasket in the first place and reported it here.......
__________________
Dr Dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-12-2007, 17:07   #14
Kenny P
Registered User
 

Join Date: Jun 2007
Car: Other Manufacturer
Posts: 9,012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Dave View Post
Good to hear these reports....

I remember when I found the LR gasket in the first place and reported it here.......
Ive read that thread. Top man.
Kenny P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-12-2007, 17:09   #15
Dr Dave
Administrator
 
Dr Dave's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2001
Car: 2006 330d M Sport
Posts: 78,881
Blog Entries: 5
Garages
Must have been over 2 years ago now, maybe 3.......

How time flies

Infact, here it is!
__________________
Dr Dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-12-2007, 17:14   #16
Rogerg
Supporter
 
Rogerg's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Northants
Car: MG TF
Posts: 217
So far, the ratio does not look that good does it.
Rogerg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-12-2007, 17:20   #17
BIGGUNS
Registered User
 

Join Date: Jul 2007
Car: FJ1100 STREET FIGHTER
Posts: 4,525
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogerg View Post
So far, the ratio does not look that good does it.
But how do you quantify, where the engine re-build has let the head gasket down, rather than the head gasket letting the engine down........... after the event?
BIGGUNS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-12-2007, 17:24   #18
Dr Dave
Administrator
 
Dr Dave's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2001
Car: 2006 330d M Sport
Posts: 78,881
Blog Entries: 5
Garages
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogerg View Post
So far, the ratio does not look that good does it.
Poor quality repair work (ie not checking liner heights etc) will always skew the figures.

Done properly, this part is more than fit for purpose.
__________________
Dr Dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-12-2007, 18:09   #19
merryhobgoblin
Registered User
 

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Colchester essex
Car: Lotus elise SC
Posts: 122
Ive seen so may bad repairs as regards to Rover head gaskets where some people have even re-used the old type dowels and not replaced them with the new steel type then blamed the repair on the gasket. Like any repair the finished product is only be as good as the person that did the job, meticulous attention to the parts being fitted including rectification of any problems is the key, don't refit a warped head, check liner heights, make sure everything is clean and grease/oil free i always use new bolts but that's no strictly necessary if they measure up OK and make sure once the head is on that you bleed the system properly if these things are followed then you wont have a problem
merryhobgoblin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-12-2007, 18:36   #20
Dr Dave
Administrator
 
Dr Dave's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2001
Car: 2006 330d M Sport
Posts: 78,881
Blog Entries: 5
Garages
Haha - never refit a warped head - nor should you even refit a skimmed (was warped) head as the alloy would have got so hot, the alloy would have lost it's temper.
__________________
Dr Dave is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
head gasket failure, hgf, land rover head gasket


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Land Rover Freelander - V6 head gasket failure The Mad Hat Man Land Rover 33 22-01-2012 12:21
Inlet Manifold Gasket or Head Gasket Failure? will-rover MG ZR / Rover 25, 200 & Streetwise 15 05-11-2010 16:42
Land rover head gasket. benbmx MG ZR / Rover 25, 200 & Streetwise 25 05-01-2008 13:51
land rover head gasket jimmysutt MGF and MGTF (Sponsored by MGF Mania) 42 08-02-2007 14:00
Land Rover Head Gasket mgf36 MGF and MGTF (Sponsored by MGF Mania) 10 08-09-2006 12:45


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:40.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ShowCase, Vendor Tools vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.