City Rover 4995 - MG-Rover.org Forums
 
 
 
Go Back   MG-Rover.org Forums > General Motoring Chat > MG / Rover Related Chat - up to 2005

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 04-06-2004, 22:07   #1
rich999
Registered User
 

Join Date: May 2004
Location: Glos
Car: MG ZS
Posts: 111
Talking City Rover 4995

Just seen city rover advertised at 4995 pre reg. now that sounds value against ford ka at 5500
rich999 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 04-06-2004, 22:12   #2
Sejin26
Registered User
 

Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: South Yorkshire, Rotherham
Car: Rover 75
Posts: 11,599
depends on what reg as some dealers still have 53reg which is getting to 3 years old in reg and nobody want's an old reg these days.
Sejin26 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Old 04-06-2004, 22:14   #3
rich999
Registered User
 

Join Date: May 2004
Location: Glos
Car: MG ZS
Posts: 111
These 04/04 pre regs sounds decent enough to me
rich999 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Old 04-06-2004, 22:16   #4
Sejin26
Registered User
 

Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: South Yorkshire, Rotherham
Car: Rover 75
Posts: 11,599
That is a bargain if it is 04 model but it is a Solo model which is a little basic for most people.
Sejin26 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Old 04-06-2004, 22:20   #5
rich999
Registered User
 

Join Date: May 2004
Location: Glos
Car: MG ZS
Posts: 111
Yes its the base model but surely that the starting point for negiating no one pays screen price
rich999 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Old 04-06-2004, 22:26   #6
Sejin26
Registered User
 

Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: South Yorkshire, Rotherham
Car: Rover 75
Posts: 11,599
I know nobody should pay screen price but it is so basic that you would just need a cheap car to go from A to B. It does have an alarm and an imobliser where as most of the compertion do not have an alarm and the 1.4 engine is very quick for this type of car.
Sejin26 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Old 04-06-2004, 23:13   #7
MGROVERnut
Registered User
 

Join Date: May 2003
Car: Other Rover
Posts: 8,731
Just think if MGR had made a model costing 5K the press would hail it as a bargain, rather than a cheap and nasty car. Perhaps MGR should be less greedy?
MGROVERnut is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Old 05-06-2004, 07:15   #8
RayCee
Registered User
 

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Zealand
Car: Daihatsu Sirion
Posts: 1,190
The price it should have been in the first place. They may not have had many to sell in the first place so a higher price cooled demand. But you end up hurting your reputation if perceived as ripping people off.
RayCee is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Old 05-06-2004, 07:46   #9
iburnley
Registered User
 

Join Date: May 2002
Car: bmw 1 series
Posts: 1,817
Quote:
Originally Posted by RayCee
The price it should have been in the first place. They may not have had many to sell in the first place so a higher price cooled demand. But you end up hurting your reputation if perceived as ripping people off.
I agree in the real world all the CityRover models are at least 1k too high,
iburnley is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Old 05-06-2004, 07:49   #10
ex-jonboy4969
Guest
 

Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,229
I agree tha the price is a little high, if the rumoured 2k profit per car IS correct then they can afford to bring the price down by 1k and still make a handsome profit, they need to improve the customers perception of this car FAST...
ex-jonboy4969 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Old 05-06-2004, 08:35   #11
David Lee Newsham
Registered User
 

Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Leigh, Greater Manchester
Car: MG ZT
Posts: 7,896
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sejin26
depends on what reg as some dealers still have 53reg which is getting to 3 years old in reg and nobody want's an old reg these days.
53reg is Sept 03 to March 04 which would make a 53reg car a maximum of 9 months old or a minimum of 3 months old.
David Lee Newsham is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Old 05-06-2004, 09:28   #12
cosb6
Registered User
 

Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Melton Mowbray (land of Pork Pies)
Car: MG ZR
Posts: 8,240
I couldn't see where 3 years came from either....

Anyone that bothered about the reg isn't going to buy a cityrover anyway....
cosb6 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Old 05-06-2004, 11:02   #13
Richard Moss
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sejin26
depends on what reg as some dealers still have 53reg which is getting to 3 years old in reg and nobody want's an old reg these days.
there haven't even been 3 changes of reg yet - just 1 (from 53 to 04).
  Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Old 05-06-2004, 11:56   #14
Sejin26
Registered User
 

Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: South Yorkshire, Rotherham
Car: Rover 75
Posts: 11,599
What I ment was the reg is three year's old not the car. Also the 54 plate is out if you want a private one and will be out to all customers in a couple of week's.
Sejin26 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Old 05-06-2004, 12:46   #15
iburnley
Registered User
 

Join Date: May 2002
Car: bmw 1 series
Posts: 1,817
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sejin26
What I ment was the reg is three year's old not the car. Also the 54 plate is out if you want a private one and will be out to all customers in a couple of week's.
I still dont get that
iburnley is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Old 05-06-2004, 12:53   #16
goose
Registered User
 

Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Preston
Car: ZT260,2 Minis, Fiat 500
Posts: 803
Confusing! 51 reg will only be 3 years old this September! Yes, you can buy a 54 plate now, but can only put it on a car which will be first registered on or after 1st September this year.
goose is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Old 05-06-2004, 14:43   #17
rw9zt
Registered User
 

Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Derbyshire
Car: Rover 25
Posts: 440
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sejin26
What I ment was the reg is three year's old not the car.
...scratches head...

53 reg started in Sept 2003, which by my reckoning is only 9 months ago. How can it be three years old?
rw9zt is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Old 05-06-2004, 19:05   #18
Sejin26
Registered User
 

Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: South Yorkshire, Rotherham
Car: Rover 75
Posts: 11,599
Let's start again. If I went to buy a new car today I would wait for a couple of week's to get a 54 reg not a 04 which is out now. What I was trying to say is why would anybody want a 53 reg which is now three regestrations old now.
Sejin26 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Old 05-06-2004, 19:32   #19
logiclee
Registered User
 

Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Notts, UK.
Car: Rover 75
Posts: 940
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sejin26
Let's start again. If I went to buy a new car today I would wait for a couple of week's to get a 54 reg not a 04 which is out now. What I was trying to say is why would anybody want a 53 reg which is now three regestrations old now.
You would have to wait more than a couple of weeks. 54 plate not out until September which is nearly 3 months away.

We are only half way through the 04 period.

My car is a 52 plate is only 18 months old.

A 53 plate is only one registration old.

Lee
logiclee is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Old 05-06-2004, 19:54   #20
xerif
Registered User
 

Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: kent
Car: Smart4four, Seat Altea TDI DSG
Posts: 4,625
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sejin26
Let's start again. If I went to buy a new car today I would wait for a couple of week's to get a 54 reg not a 04 which is out now. What I was trying to say is why would anybody want a 53 reg which is now three regestrations old now.
Does anybody really car about registrations anymore? If I was getting 1500 off list I wouldn't care.
xerif is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Reply

Bookmarks

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the MG-Rover.org Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ZT190+, 2004, Only 18K miles 4995 - Bargain PeterWitham For Sale 0 03-07-2008 20:39
city rover adam_cityrover MG ZR / Rover 25, 200 & Streetwise 2 09-08-2006 13:15
city rover steve30b Others 2 02-06-2006 13:02
City of Heroes / City of Villains Reverie158 Computer Gaming Forum 1 27-10-2005 10:48
54 Reg Cityrovers now at 4995! Honest! MikeLB MG / Rover Related Chat - up to 2005 2 01-10-2004 12:13


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:47.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ShowCase, Vendor Tools vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.